As a conscious function, 3L is interested in thoughts, arguments, and likes to share opinions with others, eagerly listening to another person’s point of view. Additionally, the Third Logic is introverted, so it seeks to formulate a correct, reality-based judgment on a particular matter first and foremost. Other people’s explanations assist 3L in this endeavor. However, it is not essential for 3L to persuade someone of the correctness of their position; the most important thing is to be confident in their own correctness. Nevertheless, since the Third Logic is an objective function, it is difficult for it to achieve such conviction, and it can easily be cast into doubt. 3L aims to obtain friendly assistance in logical argumentation matters, but at the same time, it fears being perceived as foolish or incompetent, so it refrains from freely expressing its thoughts.
Depending on which of the properties is most strongly expressed in the possessor of 3L, three accentuations of this function can be distinguished. The presence of a particular accentuation can lead to errors in typing, and the methods of protection against them will be discussed later:
Accentuation: consciousness
This Third Logic prefers to acquire knowledge through conversation. It enjoys discussions and various debates, and even if it does not participate in them, it still loves to observe from the sidelines. In general, this accentuation is less afraid to demonstrate its incompetence in a dispute than other representatives of the Third Logic, and thus, it is more talkative and more ready to defend its views. It is not difficult for this 3L to admit its mistake if the opponent’s arguments are convincing. This 3L likes to share the knowledge it possesses and its view of the world, even if it is somewhat unstructured. As a rule, it has a broad outlook and eagerly learns something new. From the outside, it can be challenging to distinguish it from 2L. It is easiest to differentiate them based on the Introversion property. The Third Logic wants to know and understand a lot; it learns and engages in discussions precisely for this reason – to understand. In contrast, the Second Logic does not have a need to form its own opinion; it is more important for them to persuade someone, provide arguments, and explain something. If the arguments show their incorrectness, 3L will become doubtful and contemplative, while 2L will come up with other arguments that will refute the previous ones. It should be remembered that this accentuation of the Third Logic is the most resistant to criticism and inquisitive.
Accentuation: introversion
A person with this accentuation is primarily focused on forming their own opinion, which will accurately reflect the true state of affairs. This 3L strives for objectivity, and if unsure of their knowledge, does not rush to share it. They prefer to listen to others and draw conclusions. In their opinion, considering all points of view helps to create a more complete picture of the issue. Due to their self-focus and reluctance to share their thoughts with others, this 3L accentuation may be mistaken for a 1L. To distinguish between them, one should pay attention to whether the formation of opinion is done with the help of others or independently. The Third Logic needs help; they are very happy with explanations, as they can get confused in their own reasoning. They will be especially pleased if you not only share information but also explain how you came to your judgments, and provide a chain of arguments. The First Logic wants to obtain objective knowledge, so if you are a professional in your field or refer to scientific research, this argument carries more weight for them than some of your views, even if they are quite logically justified. Also, the introverted 3L accentuation has one more similarity to the 1L – out of all the Third Logics, it is the most restrained and silent.
Accentuation: objectivity
This 3L is more susceptible than others to influence in a dispute and in forming their own opinion. If the interlocutor has a great authority or competence in the discussed issue, this Third Logic is inclined to agree with them. A brief explanation of their position is enough for them. Then, of course, doubts arise again, but they quickly disappear after another conversation with a “knowledgeable” person. The owner of this accentuation has the hardest time when they are “between two fires,” that is, in case several subjected Logics simultaneously argue something to them. Due to the accentuated objectivity, they are wary of taking responsibility for what opinion is correct and do not trust their own reasoning too much. Therefore, the presence of irresolvable doubts confuses them. Due to their susceptibility to influence, this 3L can be mistaken for a 4L. However, it should be remembered that the four does not like to change their opinion unnecessarily, and, moreover, is not interested in getting to the truth. Most of the information that contradicts their previous knowledge, they reject. While the Third Logic is important to understand the issue at all costs, and in conditions where this is impossible, they feel a sense of uncertainty and inferiority. Thus, this accentuation of the Third Logic is the most compliant and insecure.